Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 April 2008

I'm against bio-fuels

I'm against bio-fuels.

The demand for bio-fuels turns good farming land into the factory for the production of fuel for motor vehicles - mainly driven in affluent societies - and drives up food prices. Why feed cars when we could be feeding our fellow human beings? The world's rich are doing little to help. As demand for bio-fuel increases we'll see pressure on struggling farmers to cut production of crops that could feed their families and grow corn for fuel. As the cycle escalates we'll see the wealthy buying out small farmers to get their hands on the means of producing lucrative bio-fuel crops. Little will be done to care for the land, and even less for the communities affected.

The real answer to global warming is less consumption, constrained population growth, and genuinely renewable energy supplies. Get rid of bio-fuels before we create anarchy.

Wednesday, 13 June 2007

Climate change and common sense

There was an interesting article in yesterday's daily paper, the West Australian. Now the West, admittedly, is known for its right wing stance on pretty much everything. It's pro-big business, pro-development, pro-conservative government, and any time it has a chance to belt a lefty, lesbo, homo, greeny or libertarian around the ears, that's exactly what it does. I'm all for freedom of speech; don't get me wrong, but yesterday's story was a classic. There's plenty of evidence to support that our climate is changing - for the worse - as a result of green-house gas emissions. From Al Gore to our local CSIRO, Australia's peak scientific organisation, there's plenty of warnings of the consequences if we fail to change our habits when it comes to consumption - particularly of energy derived from fossil fuels.

Despite all this evidence, it came as no surprise to see Paul Murray of the West, under the cloak of investigative journalism, produce 'evidence' suggesting that the changes we're seeing are as a result of nothing more than cyclical changes to weather patterns that have been taking place since time began. And the 'evidence' Paul trotted out? None other than a prominent geologist who just happens to be on the payroll of one of the peak mining bodies here in Australia. Like he's going to shit in his own nest by suggesting anything alarming!

So I wonder, if Paul's so keen about evidence, if he's ever taken a trip through Europe with his eyes open. He may have observed all the smog. Cloudless skies where the horizon is constantly brown. I wonder, Paul, was that smog around a couple of hundred years ago? And has he ever wondered where the clear blue skies have gone? I remember as a kid on the farm, looking to the sky and marvelling how clear it was, how you could just see through this blueness forever. But that's probably not scientific enough for Paul, nor for his big-business, big-industry cronies. My hope is that passion will win over thought, that common-sense will prevail over theory, and that the welfare of the planet will be put before commercial interest.